Yellowknife Inn


NNSL Photo/Graphic

business pages

Subscriber pages
buttonspacer News Desk
buttonspacer Columnists
buttonspacer Editorial
buttonspacer Readers comment
buttonspacer Tenders

Demo pages
Here's a sample of what only subscribers see

Subscribe now
Subscribe to both hardcopy or internet editions of NNSL publications
.
SSIMicro
Home page text size buttonsbigger textsmall textText size Email this articleE-mail this page

NNSL photo/graphic

Bison alongside the highway near Fort Providence. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources is proposing changes to the Wildlife Act, which have been in the works for almost a decade. - Elizabeth McMillan/NNSL photo

New Wildlife Act to be unveiled this fall
After a decade of planning, changes being proposed

Elizabeth McMillan
Northern News Services
Published Wednesday, July 28, 2010

SOMBA K'E/YELLOWKNIFE - Insects are in, general hunting licences are out. Residents will have to wait a year less to start hunting and young hunters can start hunting two years earlier.

Under the proposed changes to the Wildlife Act:
  • General Hunting Licences (GHLs) will be phased out. People who fall under settled land claims just need to show proof of entitlement. Aboriginal groups without settled land claims will have another form of identification. There won't be any new GHLs, but non-aboriginal people with GHLs will be able to keep them for their lifetime. Fleck said special licences can still be issued.
  • The amount of time people will have to wait before qualifying for a resident hunter permit would be cut in half. Now Canadians and landed immigrants who will be eligible after one year in the NWT.
  • Everyone applying to be a resident hunter for the first time would have to complete a harvester training course, which will include introductions to species, recommendations about handling meat and what rifles to use, as well as information on traditional aboriginal practices.
  • There will be no more limits on gifts of meat for personal use. People who receive more than 10 kg must have receipts from hunters.
  • Resident hunters will no longer need an export permit but they can obtain one.
  • Teenagers can start hunting two years earlier. The hunting age would be dropped to 14 from 16 for big game, to 12 from 14 for small game.
  • Aboriginal harvesters may be required to report their harvests, depending on recommendations from co-management boards.
  • Violators of the Wildlife Act will be facing higher fines: a maximum of $50,000 for individuals, up from $10,000.
  • Communities serving meat for free would no longer require a permit.
  • It would still be illegal to let edible meat, hides or pelts spoil. The new act would specify what is considered waste, abandonment and edible portions. It will be illegal to feed edible portions of game to domestic animals, except for sled dogs out on the land.
  • The Wildlife Act covers most animals, including insects, but domestic animals aren't included neither are reindeer or fish, as they're administered by other acts.
  • Representatives from different levels of government and aboriginal groups – those with settled and unsettled land claims – would form a Conference of Management Authorities, to meet once or twice a year as they do to discuss the Species at Risk Act.
  • The legislative assembly would review the act in five years to see what's working and what's not. The current Wildlife Act has been used since 1988.

These are just a few of the proposed changes to the Wildlife Act the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (ENR) is recommending. Almost a decade after the territorial government first embarked on a review of the legislation the department has outlined what the new act will look like and what changes people should expect.

Susan Fleck, the director of wildlife for the department, said the consultation process started in 2000, with meetings held across the territory into 2003.

"It builds on all the ideas that were put forward earlier, seven years ago," she said. "Now we're going back out for consultation with those ideas and we want to hear back from people about what they think."

She said the process was delayed because land claim groups wanted a more collaborative approach and in 2005, the GNWT agreed to make new legislation consistent with land claims.

The department's focus shifted to the Species at Risk Act and it was only after it passed in 2009 that ENR began updateing the Wildlife Act, in co-operation with the co-management boards and aboriginal groups.

"It takes time," Fleck said, adding the biggest change to the act has been the collaborative process to put it together.

She said aboriginal peoples' right to hunt, barter and trade has been incorporated into the act, with an acknowledgement land claim agreements would supersede the act. The Wildlife Act will outline how to deal with recommendations from co-management boards, for instance if there's a conservation concern and a board recommends limited tags for a certain species.

With the proposal outlined on ENR's website, the department is soliciting comments. So far, Fleck said she hasn't received any feedback but she anticipates discussion this fall when representatives from the department will present a draft of the legislation in communities across the NWT.

People's suggestions will be incorporated into the draft, which Fleck said Environment Minister Michael Miltenberger plans to present to the legislative assembly next winter. After the document is tabled it'll go to committee with an option for more public opinion and MLAs would have a chance to vote on it during the spring session.

"They've been taking their time about it," said Jonas Sangris, a hunter from Dettah.

He said he hopes the department consults with the public in the fall and explains what is changing. He said ENR needs to make an effort to use plain language so all community members, including elders, can understand how the new act will affect them and give feedback.

"You mention the word harvest to elders, they say 'what are you doing? We're not farmers,'" he said. "Some of the words in our language, we'd like to see in there."

While he said working with existing land claim agreements and future land claims is necessary, he said it will be difficult to have one co-management board governing all the different regions because different groups have different interests.

"The minister says he wants one board across the territory. That's not going to work. How can he do it when everyone has their own agreement?" Sangris said, adding he does hope the different interests can work together.

Sangris also said he hoped the new act would outline ways to avoid what happened last fall, when Miltenberger announced an interim ban on caribou hunting, a decision many aboriginal groups said they should have been a part of.

"I want consultation for sure and see how they want to do things. We're willing to work with wildlife officers. We want to be part of it."

E-mailWe welcome your opinions. Click to e-mail a letter to the editor.